Criticism of Swaminarayan sect

From Bharatpedia, an open encyclopedia

Criticism of Swaminarayan sect is varied from opposition of worship of Sahajanand Swami (or Swaminarayan) as God and to opposition of his teachings on non-violence.[1][2]

Early criticism[edit]

After several years of establishment of sect, the 19th-century Hindu reformer Dayananda Saraswati questioned the acceptance of Sahajanand Swami aka Swaminarayan as God in the sect.[3] In the view of Dayananda, it was a historical fact that Sahajananda decked himself out as Narayan to gain disciples.[4]

Swaminarayan was criticized for receiving large gifts from his followers after renouncing the world and assuming leadership of the fellowship.[5]:81 Swaminarayan responded that he accepts gifts because “it was appropriate for the person to give” and to satisfy the devotion of his followers but he does not seek it out of personal desire.[5]:19

Swaminarayan and Caste[edit]

Some scholars have cited excerpts from Swaminarayan sect literature, such as the Shikshapatri, to criticize Swaminarayan as supporting caste discrimination.[6]:106 Other scholars and the followers of the Swaminarayan sect dispute these criticisms, stating such criticism to be unsupported by the history and context of those statements.[7]:122–126 [6]:105–107 [5]:169–173 They argue that overall, Swaminarayan’s followers, practices and teachings helped reduce the oppressive nature of caste-based customs prevalent in that era and drew individuals of lower strata towards the Swaminarayan sect.[7][6]:117 [5]:169–173

According to David Hardiman, the sect has had a class and caste bias and is an "ideological voice of commercial farmers and capitalist entrepreneurs" of Hinduism.[8] The lower classes are attracted to it because they aspire the same success and merchantile ideology. It grew, states Hardiman, in an era of British colonial rule where land taxes were raised to unprecedented heights, lands were "snatched from village communities", and poverty spread.[8] Sahajanand's pacifist approach to community re-organization and reaching out to the lowest classes of his day found support with the British rulers, but it also furthered their exploitation by the British, the local moneylenders and richer farmers. The followers of Swaminarayan "swallow the sect's view of the world uncritically", states Hardiman,[8] and accept Shikshapatri teachings such as:[7]

"None shall receive food and water, which are unacceptable at the hands of some people under scruples of caste system, may the same happen to the sanctified portions of the Shri Krishna, except at Jagannath Puri."[9][10]

This excerpt has been interpreted as an endorsement of class and caste discrimination by the Swaminarayan sect. Vibhuti Parikh disagrees and states Swaminarayan used these instructions, possibly to gradually undermine the caste system without "negating it outright".[6]:107 According to Sadhu Mangalnidhidas, the historical facts suggest Swaminarayan did not encourage discrimination and did the opposite. For evidence, he states that in the early years of the Swaminarayan Sampradaya, high-caste Hindus criticized Swaminarayan for his teachings, inclusiveness, and practices that undermined caste-based discrimination.[7] According to Kishorelal Mashruwala, “Swaminarayan was the first to bring about religious advancement of Shudras in Gujarat and Kathiawad region…And that became the main reason for many to oppose the Sampraday.”[7]:122 [11] 

An 1823 memorandum from a British official in the Asiatic Journal notes that the native upper classes “regret (as Hindus) the levelling nature of [Swaminarayan's] system” resulting in their violent opposition to and frequent merciless beatings of Swaminarayan’s disciples.[7]:122 [12] Swaminarayan’s doctrine that everyone’s true self is the pure atma within which God resides, led him to reject caste-based discrimination and welcome those of all caste backgrounds equally in his religious community.[7][6]:105 According to Sadhu Mangalnidhidas and Vibhuti Parikh,, Swaminarayan rejected caste prejudices but practically accommodated 19th-century social norms and caste language in his public writings. The aim and strategy was to protect and reform the community, though it may have had "unintended negative consequences such as the reinforcement of caste identities".[7]:122–123[6]:106–107

Numerous historical accounts show that in practice Swaminarayan himself and his followers shared food and openly interacted with everyone without discrimination.[7]:122–124 When asked for clarity on his views on caste by Anglican Bishop Reginald Heber, Swaminarayan explained that since he considered the distinctions of caste to be ultimately false, “he did not give the subject much importance, but that he wished not to give offence,” and thus gestured towards some minor accommodations to the practice in his public writings.[7]:124–126 [13]

Criticism by Mahatma Gandhi[edit]

In 1918, Mahatma Gandhi issued two public appeals for Indians to enlist in the British army to fight in World War I. He asserted that fighting in the war would provide Indians necessary self-defense skills that had been eroded by the deep-seated influence of India’s ascetic culture, which he disdained.[2][14]

This advocacy of violence led some of his staunchest supporters, including his nephew, Maganlal Gandhi, to question whether Gandhi was forsaking his non-violent ideals.[2][15] In a July 1918 letter replying to his nephew, Gandhi stated that any conception of non-violence that prohibited self-defense was erroneous. To support this argument, Gandhi criticized the ethics of love and absolute ahimsa (non-violence) he observed in the teachings of Swaminarayan and Vallabhacharya. According to Gandhi, this love was mere “sentimentalism,” and its concomitant absolute ahimsa “robbed us of our manliness” and “made the people incapable of self-defence.” Gandhi wrote that Swaminarayan and Vallabhacharya had not grasped the essence of non-violence. Instead Gandhi argued for a non-violence that would “permit [our offspring] to commit violence, to use their strength to fight,” since that capacity for violence could be used for the benefit of society, like in “restraining a drunkard from doing evil” or “killing a dog…infected with rabies.”[15]

By 1924, however, Gandhi’s criticism of Swaminarayan and his ethical teachings had turned into admiration. While arguing in a Navjivan newspaper editorial that it was a duty to resort to violence for self-defense against Afghani terrorists, Gandhi admitted that he could not personally adopt this approach because he had chosen the path of love even against his enemies. Gandhi explained that, according to the Hindu scriptures, a single such self-controlled person could eradicate violence from the hearts of one’s opposition. It was through this power of love that Gandhi asserted, “what was accomplished in Gujarat by one person, Sahajanand [Swaminarayan], could not be accomplished by the power of the State.” Moreover, he said that “The Age of Sahajanand has not come to an end. It is only devotion and self-control like his that are wanted.” Ultimately, Gandhi said that while he was attempting Swaminarayan’s approach himself, he did “not have the strength of heart to act upon” it the way that Swaminarayan had successfully done.[16]

Over time, Gandhi’s religious thought showed a further influence of Swaminarayan’s teachings, as, by 1930, he had included many hymns composed by Swaminarayan poets in his Ashram Bhajanavali, a book of prayers which were used in his twice-daily prayer service.[17] In his writings, he often drew inspiration from the spiritual teachings of Swaminarayan saint-poets Nishkulanand Swami and Muktanand Swami, the latter being the author of his most frequently used prayer.[18][19][20][21] Indian sociologist and Gandhian contemporary, N. A. Thoothi, had argued by 1935 that Mahatma Gandhi was “most influenced in his inner-most being… by the teachings of the Swaminarayan Sampradaya above all.” Thoothi concluded that “most of [Gandhi’s] thought, activities, and even methods of most of the institutions which he has been building up and serving, have the flavor of Swaminarayan, more than that of any other sect of Hinduism.”[22]

Modern criticism[edit]

Some Hindus in the West criticized temples built by Pramukh Swami Maharaj as grandiose.[23]

References[edit]

  1. Rudert, Angela (2004-05-11). "Inherent Faith and Negotiated Power: Swaminarayan Women in the United States". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Parel, Anthony (2011). "Gandhi and the State". The Cambridge Companion to Gandhi. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 154–170. ISBN 978-0-521-11670-1. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  3. Narayan, Kirin (1992). Storytellers, saints and scoundrels : folk narrative in Hindu religious teaching. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 141–143. ISBN 8120808908. OCLC 320229511.
  4. Narayan, Kirin. (1992). Storytellers, saints and scoundrels : folk narrative in Hindu religious teaching. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. p. 143. ISBN 8120808908. OCLC 320229511.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Williams, Raymond Brady. (2001). An introduction to Swaminarayan Hinduism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 052165422X. OCLC 43615520.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 Parikh, Vibhuti (2016). "The Swaminarayan Ideology and Kolis in Gujarat". Swaminarayan Hinduism : Tradition, Adaptation and Identity (1st ed.). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press. pp. 94–114. ISBN 9780199086573. OCLC 948338914. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 Mangalnidhidas, Sadhu (2016). "Sahajanand Swami's Approach to Caste". Swaminarayan Hinduism : Tradition, Adaptation and Identity (1st ed.). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press. pp. 115–128. ISBN 9780199086573. OCLC 948338914. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Hardiman, David (1988). "Class Base of Swaminarayan Sect". Economic and Political Weekly. 23 (37): 1907–1912. ISSN 0012-9976. JSTOR 4379024.
  9. "Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha". Brill’s Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Volume 5. Retrieved 2019-09-20.
  10. Williams, Raymond Brady; Trivedi, Yogi (2016). Swaminarayan Hinduism: Tradition, Adaptation, and Identity. Oxford University Press. p. 143. ISBN 9780199089598.
  11. Mashruwala, Kishorelal (1940). Sahajanand Swami and the Swaminarayan Sampradaya (2nd ed.). Ahmedabad: Navjivan Publishing House. pp. 63–64.
  12. N.A. (1823). "Indian Sect: Memorandum Respecting a Sect Lately Introduced by a Person Calling Himself Swamee Narain". The Asiatic Journal and Monthly Register for British India and Its Dependencies. Kinsbury, Parbury and Allen. XV: 348–349.
  13. Heber, Reginald (1828). Narrative of a Journey through the Upper Provinces of India, from Calcutta to Bombay, 1824-1825, with Notes upon Ceylon, an Account of a Journey to Madras and the Southern Provinces, 1826, and Letters Written in India. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street. p. 41.
  14. Hardiman, David (2011). "Gandhi's Global Legacy". The Cambridge Companion to Gandhi. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 239–254. ISBN 978-0-521-11670-1. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  15. 15.0 15.1 Gandhi, Mohandas (1965). The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi. Vol. Vol.14. Ahmedabad: The Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. pp. 504–505. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help)
  16. Gandhi, Mohandas (1965). The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi. Vol. Vol.23. Ahmedabad: The Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. pp. 468–469. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help)
  17. Chatterjee, Margaret (1983). Gandhi’s Religious Thought. London: The Macmillan Press, LTD. p. 156. ISBN 978-1-349-05367-4.
  18. Clooney, Francis X. (2005). Hindu Wisdom for All God’s Children. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 51. ISBN 1-59752-068-3.
  19. Robb, Peter; Taylor, David (1978). Rule, Protest, Identity: Aspects of Modern South Asia. Curzon Press. p. 121. ISBN 978-0391008663.
  20. Gandhi, Mohandas (2019). Andrews, C.F. (ed.). Mahatma Gandhi at Work: His Own Story Continued. Routledge.
  21. Gandhi, Mahatma (1994) [1956]. Homer, Jack A. (ed.). The Gandhi reader : a source book of his life and writings (Rev ed.). New York: Grove Press. p. 8. ISBN 0802131611. OCLC 32833421.
  22. Thoothi, N.A. (1938). The Vaishnavas of Gujarat: Being a study of methods of investigation of social phenomena. Calcutta: Longmans, Green, and Co, LTD. p. 279.
  23. Venkataraman, Ayesha (2016-08-19). "Pramukh Swami Maharaj, Whose Hindu Sect Became Largest in U.S., Dies at 94". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-09-20.
Information red.svg
Scan the QR code to donate via UPI
Dear reader, We kindly request your support in maintaining the independence of Bharatpedia. As a non-profit organization, we rely heavily on small donations to sustain our operations and provide free access to reliable information to the world. We would greatly appreciate it if you could take a moment to consider donating to our cause, as it would greatly aid us in our mission. Your contribution would demonstrate the importance of reliable and trustworthy knowledge to you and the world. Thank you.

Please select an option below or scan the QR code to donate
₹150 ₹500 ₹1,000 ₹2,000 ₹5,000 ₹10,000 Other