Ramachandra Dattatrya Ranade

From Bharatpedia, an open encyclopedia
Information red.svg
Scan the QR code to donate via UPI
Dear reader, We need your support to keep the flame of knowledge burning bright! Our hosting server bill is due on June 1st, and without your help, Bharatpedia faces the risk of shutdown. We've come a long way together in exploring and celebrating our rich heritage. Now, let's unite to ensure Bharatpedia continues to be a beacon of knowledge for generations to come. Every contribution, big or small, makes a difference. Together, let's preserve and share the essence of Bharat.

Thank you for being part of the Bharatpedia family!
Please scan the QR code on the right click here to donate.

0%

   

transparency: ₹0 raised out of ₹100,000 (0 supporter)



Ramchandra Dattatray Ranade
Downloadrdranade.jpg
Born1886 A.D.
Jamakhandi, Bagalkot District, Karnataka, India
Died1957 A.D.
Nimbal, near Bijapur, Karnataka, India
NationalityIndian
OccupationTeaching, Retired as Head of Department of Philosophy, Allahabad University; Vice-Chancellor, Allahabad University.
Known forHis work on Upanishads – A constructive survey of Upanishadic philosophy

Ramchandra Dattatray Ranade (1886–1957) was an Indian scholar-philosopher-saint of Karnataka and Maharashtra.

Biography[edit]

He was born on 3 July 1886 in Jamakhandi, in Bagalkot District of Karnataka. After completing his schooling he studied at Deccan College, Pune. In the year 1914 he passed M.A. with full honours and for a very brief period joined the teaching staff of Fergusson College, Pune. He taught at Willindon College, Sangli, on a regular basis before being invited to join Allahabad University as Head of Department of Philosophy where he rose to be the Vice-Chancellor. After retirement in 1946 he lived in an ashrama in a small village, Nimbal, on border of Maharashtra and Karnataka, near Vijaypura ( Bijapur) where he died on 6 June 1957.

Philosophy[edit]

According to Shri Gurudev Ramchandra Dattatray Ranade, the three main approaches in arriving at the solution to the problem of the Ultimate Reality have traditionally been the theological, the cosmological and the psychological approaches.[1] The cosmological approach involves looking outward, to the world; the psychological approach meaning looking inside or to the Self; and the theological approach is looking upward or to God. Descartes takes the first and starts with the argument that the Self is the primary reality, self-consciousness the primary fact of existence, and introspection the start of the real philosophical process.[2] According to him, we can arrive at the conception of God only through the Self because it is God who is the cause of the Self and thus, we should regard God as more perfect than the Self. Spinoza on the other hand, believed that God is the be-all and the end-all of all things, the alpha and the omega of existence. From God philosophy starts, and in God philosophy ends. The manner of approach of the Upanishadic philosophers to the problem of ultimate reality was neither the Cartesian nor Spinozistic. The Upanishadic philosophers regarded the Self as the ultimate existence and subordinated the world and God to the Self. The Self to them, is more real than either the world or God. It is only ultimately that they identify the Self with God, and thus bridge over the gulf that exists between the theological and psychological approaches to reality. They take the cosmological approach to start with, but they find that this cannot give them the solution of the ultimate reality. So, Upanishadic thinkers go back and start over by taking the psychological approach and here again, they cannot find the solution to the ultimate reality. They therefore perform yet another experiment by taking the theological approach. They find that this too is lacking in finding the solution. They give yet another try to the psychological approach, and come up with the solution to the problem of the ultimate reality. Thus, the Upanishadic thinkers follow a cosmo-theo-psychological approach.[2] A study of the mukhya Upanishads shows that the Upanishadic thinkers progressively build on each other's ideas. They go back and forth and refute improbable approaches before arriving at the solution of the ultimate reality.[3]

Works[edit]

He was a good orator who was also a good writer. His monumental work that made him famous, A Constructive Survey of Upanishadic Philosophy,[4] was published by Oriental Books Agency, Pune, in 1926 under the patronage of Sir Parashuramarao Bhausaheb, Raja of Jamkhandi.[5] He also wrote Pathway to God in Hindi and Marathi[6] and Ramdasvacanamrut, which is based on the scriptures of Samarth Ramdas. As an eminent scholar of the Upanishads who had specialised in Greek philosophy, Shri Gurudev Ramchandra Dattatray Ranade emphasised the centrality of the psychological approach as opposed to the theological approach for the proper understanding of the Ultimate Reality.[7] His works also include Pathway to God in Kannada literature. The Bhagavadgita as Philosophy of God Realisation. Evolution of my own thought. Ekanath Vachanamrut. Sant Vachanamrut.

Inchegiri Sampradaya[edit]

Shri Gurudev Ramchandra Dattatray Ranade belonged to the Inchegeri Sampradaya.

Shri Chandra Bhanu Pathak was disciple of Gurudev Ranade, who carried forward his lineage in northern part of India. He was a renowned, loving, affectionate guru among his disciples who stayed in Bikaner, Rajasthan. Raj Kamal Vyas, who is disciple of Shri Chandra Bhanu pathak has translated Gurudev Ranade Literature in Hindi from Marathi and English as well. The lineage is being carried forward by Shri KhinwSingh ji Shekhawat (aka Shri Yogkshem shekhawat) among his and disciples of Shri Chandra Bhanu Pathak. Template:Navnath Sampradaya – Inchegiri Sampradaya

References[edit]

  1. Ranade 1926, p. 247.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Ranade 1926, p. 248.
  3. Ranade 1926, pp. 249–278.
  4. R.D.Ranade. A Constructive Survey of Upanishadic Philosophy.
  5. Jashan P. Vaswani (1 August 2008). Sketches of Saints Known and Unknown. New Delhi: Sterling Paperbacks (P) Ltd. p. 197 to 202. ISBN 9788120739987.
  6. Harold G. Coward (30 October 1987). Modern Indian Responses to Religious Pluralism. Suny Press. p. 181. ISBN 9780887065729.
  7. Nalini Bhushan, Jay L. Garfield (26 August 2011). Indian Philosophy in English: From Renaissance to Independence. Oxford University Press. p. 245. ISBN 9780199911288.

Sources[edit]

  • Ranade, R. D. (1926), A constructive survey of Upanishadic philosophy, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan

External links[edit]